All
-
-
-
-
-
Plaintiff's Notice of Subsequent Authority Regarding Defendant's Motion to Stay in Sevela v. Kozeny & Mccubbin, L.C.
Defendants previously filed a Motion for Judgment on the pleadings and Alternative Motion to Stay. (Filing No. 25) The basis for the Motion to Stay was the pending Supreme Court decision in the case, Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, v. Wells Fargo, 879 F.3d 1216, 1221 (10th Cir. 2018). The United States Supreme Court…
-
-
Order: National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-3 v. Clayborn
Civil Action File No. 19-C-04424-S6
Read More about Order: National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-3 v. Clayborn
-
Order in Portfolio Recovery Associates v. Delgado
Order in Portfolio Recovery Associates v. Delgado in the Superior Court for the State of Alaska Third Judicial District at Anchorage.
Read More about Order in Portfolio Recovery Associates v. Delgado
-
Opposition to Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment in Pearson v. Hodgson
Defendant Securus Technologies, Inc.’s opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter of Amend Order of Judgment and certify question of law to Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. For the reasons stated in Sheriff Hodgson’s Opposition, Plaintiffs’ Motion should be denied.
Read More about Opposition to Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment in Pearson v. Hodgson
-
Opposition to Defendants' Preliminary Objections Regarding Attebury v. Earn Company
Sample brief regaring opposition to preliminary objections
Read More about Opposition to Defendants' Preliminary Objections Regarding Attebury v. Earn Company
-
Opinion in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
The Federal Government provides low-income housing tax credits that are distributed to developers by designated state agencies. In Texas, the Department of Housing and Community Affairs (Department) distributes the credits. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. (ICP), a Texas-based nonprofit corporation that assists low-income families in obtaining affordable housing, brought a disparate-impact claim under §§804(a) and…
-
Opinion in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
Slip Opinion in Jesinoski et ux. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al. before the U.S. Supreme Court reversing the judgment of the Eighth Circuit and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Read More about Opinion in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
Support NCLC
Please support NCLC's work to advance consumer rights and economic justice with a tax-deductible contribution today!
Donate