Resources Archive

Plaintiffs' Response in Eastman v. NPL Capital LLC

June 19, 2019

Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's motion to dismiss in Eastman v. NPL Capital LLC

Plaintiff's Notice of Subsequent Authority Regarding Defendant's Motion to Stay in Sevela v. Kozeny & Mccubbin, L.C.

March 22, 2019

Defendants previously filed a Motion for Judgment on the pleadings and Alternative Motion to Stay. (Filing No. 25) The basis for the Motion to Stay was the pending Supreme Court decision in the case, Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, v. Wells Fargo, 879 F.3d 1216, 1221 (10th Cir. 2018). The United States Supreme Court…

Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendant ACM Vision

March 24, 2021

Petition to the FDIC Regarding the Community Reinvestment Act Examination of TAB

June 30, 2022

The petition reflects the overwhelming public view that predatory rent-a-bank loans trap borrowers in long debt cycles and disguise loans that are illegal, and thus these loans do not meet the convenience and needs of the community. We believe that these business practices should be taken into account in assessing TAB Bank’s performance under the CRA.

Pass S. 1279, the FUTURE Act and Restore Funding to Serve Students of Color and Native Students

November 22, 2019

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the undersigned organization write to strongly urge to immediately pass S.1279, the Fostering Undergraduate Talent by Unlocking Resources for Education (FUTURE) Act to ensure Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs), Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs), Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions (ANNHIs), Predominantly Black Institutions (PBIs), Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-Serving Institutions (AANAPISIs), and Native American-Serving Nontribal Institution (NASNTIs) have the resources they need to support their students.

Comments to the FDIC Regarding Parent Companies of Industrial Banks and Industrial Loan Companies

July 1, 2020

Consumer and civil rights groups write to strongly oppose the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)’s proposed rule on Parent Companies of Industrial Banks and Industrial Loan Companies (proposal or proposed rule) as well as the agency’s approval of new ILC charters. While these actions raise a number of concerns, our comments focus on the dramatic…

Pandemic Lawsuits in California: Credit Card Issuers & Debt Buyers Top Litigants in 2021

July 15, 2022

In 2021, the 15 most common private litigants in collection lawsuits in 16 California counties were all credit card issuers and debt buyers. Collectively, these 15 companies were engaged in 76.2% of all collection lawsuits filed in those counties.

Overturn the OCC's "Fake Lender" Predatory Lending Rule

March 15, 2021

Since the American Revolution, states have limited interest rates to stop predatory lending. But predatory lenders are starting to launder their loans through banks to evade state laws that make loans up to 179% APR illegal (Bank loans are generally exempt from state rate caps). A rule by the regulator of the nation’s largest banks…

Order: National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-3 v. Clayborn

September 11, 2019

Civil Action File No. 19-C-04424-S6

Order in Portfolio Recovery Associates v. Delgado

December 6, 2016

Order in Portfolio Recovery Associates v. Delgado in the Superior Court for the State of Alaska Third Judicial District at Anchorage.

Opposition to the Petition for Declaratory Ruling Filed by Northstar Alarm Services, LLC’s

March 15, 2019

Pursuant to the Public Notice issued by the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau,the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) files these comments on behalf of its low-incomeclients and Consumer Reports, Consumer Action, Consumer Federation of America,Electronic Privacy Information Center, the National Association of Consumer Advocates,and Public Knowledge. NorthStar Alarm Services, LLC. (NorthStar) requests in its petition…

Opposition to Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment in Pearson v. Hodgson

August 3, 2020

Defendant Securus Technologies, Inc.’s opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter of Amend Order of Judgment and certify question of law to Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. For the reasons stated in Sheriff Hodgson’s Opposition, Plaintiffs’ Motion should be denied.

All Resources