This amicus brief urges the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to uphold a trial court order requiring an insurance company and its subsidiaries to pay restitution to consumers. The companies represented that their agents were impartial and would find health insurance that best met consumers’ needs. The companies’ agents then quietly slipped low-value products into consumers’ purchase agreements. The brief argues that proof that the defendant made material misrepresentations, that they were widely disseminated, and that consumers purchased the Defendant’s product was sufficient to justify restitution.
See all resources related to: Consumer Protection Regulation